Embassy Sadahalli Location

The address Embassy Sadahalli files under

The signed Terms of Reference certificate prints the site's location as Navarathna Agrahara Village, Jala Hobli, Yelahanka Taluk, Bangalore – 562 157. The Common Application Form record adds the district, Bengaluru Urban, and carries sub-district code 7103. The revenue village code is 612888.

The address line this site uses is therefore:

MS Engineering College Road, Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Yelahanka Taluk, Bengaluru 562157.

Set against what has been circulating:

One further address token appears in the circulating material and does not appear on this site: it could not be located in any gazetteer or map source we checked, so we do not publish it. An address element nobody can find is not an address element.

A spelling note, because it will come up in searches. The filings spell the revenue village Navarathna Agrahara, with an h. The working title on this site drops it, as Navaratna Agrahara. Both refer to the same village. We have kept the certificate's spelling wherever we are quoting the record and used the simpler spelling for the project's working title.

The coordinate this site publishes, and what it is not

We publish 13.20404, 77.62470.

That figure is inferred, at medium confidence, and here is exactly how it was derived. The filings carry a KML boundary for the parcel. Its bounding box runs from latitude 13.20228 to 13.20579 and from longitude 77.62328 to 77.62611. Those extents are verified — they are the filed geometry. The coordinate we publish is the centre of that box, which is our own arithmetic, not a surveyed point.

Two honest qualifications follow from that.

The bounding box is a rectangle drawn around an irregular parcel, so the box is larger than the land and its centre is not the centroid of the site. And a centre point is not a gate. This is not a surveyed coordinate, it is not the project entrance, and we publish it to five decimals precisely because more precision than that would be a false claim.

Two other coordinates are in circulation for this project. One of them sits roughly 620 metres from the centre of the filed box and falls outside the filed geometry altogether; we discard it. The other falls inside the filed box, about 144 metres from its centre, and is consistent with our figure — but it and the Plus Code circulating alongside it appear to have been generated from the same map link, so they are one datum rather than two independent confirmations. We treated them as one.

The land itself is filed at 6.80 hectares, which is 16.80 acres, with a plot area of 68,012.5 sq m and a built-up area of 262,029.83 sq m, at a filed project cost of Rs 564 crore. The earlier filing gave the land as 6.45 hectares, or 15.94 acres, with a built-up area of 261,294.83 sq m. The later filing lists four survey numbers the earlier certificate does not, and the filed land area rises from 6.45 to 6.80 hectares. We are not going to tell you that the one caused the other — no record states a per-survey-number area, and one survey number changed from a full to a partial holding, which would work the other way.

The parcel is assembled from survey numbers 124(P), 129(P), 131(P), 132(P), 134(P), 136(P), 137(P), 138(P), 139(P), 140(P), 141(P), 142(P), 143(P), 144, 145(P), 146, 147, 148, 149(P) and 150(P) in the revenue village. Those numbers, not the pincode and not the pin, are what identifies this land.

For a sense of how intensively the parcel is to be used: dividing the filed built-up area by the filed plot area gives 262,029.83 ÷ 68,012.5 = about 3.85. Treat that as an estimate of intensity and nothing more. We do not know what the filing counts inside "built-up area" — basements and service areas are commonly included — so it should not be read as a sanctioned floor-area ratio.

How to read the routed distances on this page

Every kilometre figure below is OSRM road distance on the OpenStreetMap driving profile, measured from the published coordinate. Destinations are live OpenStreetMap records. Where OSM does not carry a place, it was dropped rather than guessed, which is why some categories below are thinner than a brochure's.

Two deliberate omissions.

We publish no drive times. Not one number of minutes appears on this page. Free-flow times are a floor nobody in Bengaluru experiences, and a single peak figure is a ceiling that is materially overstated on long highway legs. A minute count on a property page is almost always somebody's best case presented as a fact. Kilometres are checkable; minutes are not.

We publish no straight-line distances as distances. The detour column in the tables below is the ratio of road distance to straight-line distance, and on this parcel it is unusually informative, so it stays visible.

That ratio produces a real finding, and it is the opposite of what most buyers expect.

Short local trips here carry the worst detours; the long airport run is efficient. The college is 0.29 km away in a straight line and 0.90 km by road — you drive more than three times the map distance to reach something you can see. That is the signature of a village lane network that has not yet been rationalised into a grid. Beyond about eleven kilometres, once a journey joins the highway, the ratios collapse to 1.26 to 1.4, which is close to as direct as Indian road geometry gets.

The practical reading: this location is better connected to far things than to near ones. Anything within five kilometres will take longer than the map suggests. Anything on the highway will not.

Rail, and the Doddajala ambiguity

Read the word "halt" carefully. A halt on a suburban line is not the same thing as a station with meaningful passenger service. The two nearest rail nodes to this parcel, at 6.92 km and 10.31 km, are halts. The nearest full railway junction with real service is Yelahanka Junction, 15.89 km by road.

Now the point that most listings for this corridor get wrong. "Doddajala" is ambiguous and has to be disambiguated every time. There is a Doddajala railway halt, and there is a planned Doddajala metro station on the Blue Line, Phase 2B, the KR Puram to airport corridor. The 5.34 km row above is the OpenStreetMap node routed from our pin — it is the rail node, not a metro entrance.

The metro station is under construction and not operational. We do not publish an opening date for it, because we have no document that fixes one, and a date taken from a news report is not a commitment. Any material that presents metro access at this parcel as an existing amenity is describing something that does not yet carry passengers. If metro proximity is central to your decision, treat it as a proposal with an uncertain date, price the location as it stands today, and treat the station as upside if it arrives.

Colleges, and the campus cluster on MSEC Road

This is the densest category in the table, and it explains the road's name. Higher education arrived on this corridor before housing did, which has two consequences a buyer should weigh in opposite directions: a standing rental demand from students and staff, and the traffic and land-use character that comes with a campus belt rather than a residential one.

Retail, and what the routed table cannot tell you

That is the entire mall category. Organised retail is fourteen to fifteen kilometres away, which for practical purposes means a planned weekend trip, not an errand.

For everyday needs — grocery, a chemist, a bank branch, a vegetable market — the routed table has nothing to offer, and we are not going to invent it. OpenStreetMap does not carry reliable records for small neighbourhood retail in this village, and we do not publish what we cannot route. What we can tell you honestly is the shape of the problem: a village-edge parcel on a college road, with organised retail fourteen kilometres out and no verified data on what sits between. Everyday shopping will depend on what the surrounding villages already support and on what the project's own retail provision turns out to be, and neither of those is documented in anything we hold.

This is a category to walk, not to read about. Drive MSEC Road on a weekday evening and look at what is actually open.

Who else is building in Navarathna Agrahara village

This revenue village is not empty of development, and one point of confusion needs clearing up because it affects how you read comparables.

A Mahindra Lifespace project sits in the same revenue village and the same pincode. Pincode is therefore useless as a way of telling the two parcels apart. The discriminators that do work are survey numbers and promoter: Embassy's parcel is assembled from survey numbers 124 to 150, filed by Embassy Developments Limited; the Mahindra parcel is at survey numbers 7 to 12 and 92, filed by Anthurium Developers Limited, which Mahindra Lifespace Developers identified as its subsidiary in its own press release of 23 January 2025.

The filed geometries confirm the separation. The two bounding boxes are disjoint on both axes, with an east–west edge gap of about 1.07 km, a north–south gap of 57 m, and box centre to box centre of 1.47 km. There is zero overlap. They are neighbours in the same village, not the same land.

Separately, DS Max Sky Shlokam is registered with K-RERA in this revenue village, which is a useful data point for one reason: it establishes that registrable residential development in Navarathna Agrahara has already reached the registration stage. It is a different product class from anything Embassy would build here and we do not treat it as a comparable.

On Embassy's own footprint: Embassy has an established presence on this corridor, and its Embassy Springs township is marketed with an address in this same revenue village, which is a large part of why aggregators confuse the two. Springs sits roughly one to 2.4 kilometres away on the same corridor — a proximity figure, not a routed road distance, because our routed table does not carry the township as a destination. This project is not part of Embassy Springs, does not share its registrations, and should not be assumed to share its amenities or its phasing.

What Navaratna Agrahara asks you to accept

A location page that lists only strengths is a brochure. Here is the honest ledger for this parcel.

What is genuinely good. The airport is 11.67 km by road on an efficient highway leg. Schooling is unusually strong for a village-edge site, with two options inside three kilometres and the international cluster within sixteen. Higher education is dense enough that rental demand has an obvious source. Land use is settled under the BIAAPA plan, which removes one of the larger risks a pre-launch North Bengaluru parcel can carry. And the address, once corrected, sits in Bengaluru Urban district rather than Bengaluru Rural, which is a modest but real administrative advantage.

What you are accepting. Healthcare is thin — nothing meaningful inside seven kilometres, recognisable multi-speciality capability at thirteen to eighteen. Organised retail is fourteen kilometres out and everyday retail is undocumented. The local road network is inefficient in a measurable way, with detour ratios of ×1.6 to ×3.15 on nearly every trip under seven kilometres, so short journeys cost more than a map implies. Rail access today is halts, not stations; the nearest junction with real service is 15.89 km. And the metro station that would change the calculus is under construction, not operational, on a date we will not guess at.

What is simply unknown. The frontage and access arrangement onto MS Engineering College Road. Whether the approach road is to be widened. What everyday retail exists within a short drive. Whether school transport serves this village. None of that is in any document we hold, and we would rather leave the gaps visible than fill them with plausible sentences.

The location's character today is a college road on the airport corridor, at the point where a village is being converted into a housing belt. A parcel of 16.80 acres carrying 1,304 apartments and 48 villaments — 1,352 homes in total across 8 towers, with a standalone clubhouse building — is a significant addition to that belt. Much of what would make this an easy place to live is proposed rather than built, both on the site and around it. That is a legitimate thing to buy into at pre-launch pricing, but it should be bought into with the timeline understood rather than assumed. For buyers already comfortable with the embassy-group name, Embassy Millennium adds a local portfolio lens without skipping the practical checks around cost and daily use.